Kathleen Folbigg has spent her final, devastating day on the stand at the inquiry into her convictions.
Under examination from her barrister, Jeremy Morris SC, Kathy said: “The problem that landed me in the position that I am in is assumptions being made and things been made out of context and nobody understanding what I was trying to say when I was writing in those diaries.”
She also sought to clarify some misinterpretations made regarding her testimony over the last few days.
She said that while she still wonders if some supernatural power took all four of her children, she was not suggesting “some ghost or entity” did so.
“I have no answers as to why I have survived my children … I was constantly trying to search for that answer,” she said.
“I’m certainly not saying some ghost or entity or whatever came down and took my children.”
A June 1997 entry in Kathy’s diary reads: “Don’t think I’ll suffer Alzheimer’s Disease, my brain has too much happening, unstored and unrecalled memories just waiting, heaven help the day they surface and I recall, that will be the day to lock me up and throw away the key, something I’m sure will happen one day”.
Kathy explained in court: “I was reflecting and wondering whether I could end up in a mental institution if I was to recall all of the memories that I’d ever had in my life”.
She also revealed the terrible toll losing her four children took on her.
She said she believed she had only two options after the death of her third baby – to leave her husband or die.
She told the court that she would write letters to her husband Craig rather than talk to him. She read out one letter in which she talks about her feelings after the death of their baby daughter Sarah.
“The more I think about what our lives will be like, just you and me, the more I’m scared, I don’t think that I could handle it,” she wrote.
“I clearly remember how close I got to leaving you before Sarah was born, I thought that having her would solve the problems, I was wrong, that was a mistake.
“She (Sarah) was by no means a mistake.
“I love her more than anything and wouldn’t have my life go in any other direction … but she is gone and I am now faced with all the feelings and thoughts I had before but worse.
“Having her solve the problem of fulfilling your life and making you happy with life again but now because of cruel fate all that’s happened is turned your life into misery once more, how much misery and tragic deals of life is a couple supposed to bare?
“I suppose this last one has broken me, I don’t know about you.
“The bottom line is I don’t want this life any more, I want to have a major change.
She went on to write that she felt like her life had “expired”.
“The only two options I have left are – try life on my own or die, my survival instinct is too high for option two,” she wrote.
Morris also pointed to a number of diary entries where Kathy had written about plans for her children’s future and schooling.
He then asked her if she loved each of her children.
“Yes,” she replied.
He added: “Did you love Sarah?”
“Absolutely, yes,” she replied.
He asked: “Did you feel grief at her death?”
“Of course, I still feel it now,” she answered.
She also expressed her love for her other three children.
After leaving court, Kathy’s longtime friends Helen Cummings and Tracy Chapman gave each other a supportive hug after days of high emotion.
Helen said: “I hope no mother in the world who has lost her babies through unexplained circumstances EVER has to go through what this mother has during these past few days.”
John Folbigg, the eldest brother of Kathy’s ex-husband Craig, spoke to the media outside the court.
“The chapter unfolding now we feel was unnecessary and most definitely unwelcome,” he said.
“However we have endured it, and as ultimately it would, we feel, help to ensure that the justice that Caleb, Patrick, Sarah and Laura received in 2003 is upheld.”
After receiving final submissions, Judge Reginald Blanch will prepare a report for the Governor.
It was another harrowing day in court for Kathy as she gave evidence regarding her diaries at the judicial inquiry into her convictions.
Dr Emma Cunliffe, who is a legal expert on Kathy’s case, tweeted during the hearing: “Kathleen Folbigg is today facing extremely lengthy, hostile cross-examination from Margaret Cunneen SC for Craig Folbigg (ongoing). She is remarkably calm, reflective and articulate about the disturbed thought patterns that attended her depression and bereavement.”
Kathy denied suggestions put to her by barrister Margaret Cunneen SC that “homicidal rages” or “psychological mood swings” led her to smother her babies.
She said she falsely believed her moods affected her children who “decided they didn’t want to be with me anymore”.
Cunneen said: “Of course, you know, that babies don’t decide whether or not to live?”
Kathy replied: “At that stage in my life, I did not know that. My concerns were almost paranoia.”
In a December 1996 entry, before the birth of her fourth child, Laura, Kathy wrote in her diary: “I know now that battling wills and sleep deprivation were the causes last time”.
Former NSW District Court judge Reginald Blanch, QC, who is heading the inquiry into her convictions, asked: “When you say the causes last time, the causes of …?”
“The causes of them dying,” she answered, having earlier told Blanch, “it was a wrong belief and a warped belief that my children had decided they weren’t staying with me any more.”
Kathy repeatedly expressed her innocence on the stand.
“I didn’t kill my children and these diaries are a record of just how depressed and how much trouble I was having and all of the issues that go with that,” she said.
Her friend Tracy Chapman notes: “Research shows in our mid 20’s to early 30’s we have poor cognition, limited critical thinking skills and judgement capacity. Hence the mish mash of diary entries that Kathy had been asked to put on paper by counsellors to help get the trauma of losing her children out of her head.
“Could Kath see how these may be interpreted by others? No. And they weren’t intended for others.
“Could she see their ambiguity and possible future interpretation. Definitely not … She was innocently dumping confused thoughts to help clear her head as she’d been asked to do by professionals.
“Kath’s diaries have been weaponized, which is the exact opposite of what they were intended for.”
The Daily Mail has again acted without journalistic ethics, headlining a story about the inquiry “Diary of a monster”.
According to the MEAA’s Journalist Code of Ethics, journalists should “Report and interpret honestly, striving for accuracy, fairness and disclosure of all essential facts. Do not suppress relevant available facts, or give distorting emphasis.”
The Daily Mail has shamefully and completely failed on that front.
It was a harrowing day in court for Kathleen Folbigg and her supporters as the third week of the judicial inquiry into her convictions commenced.
According to her friend Tracy Chapman: “This week will go down in history as a true reflection of all that’s wrong with how women are treated in a legal system that unconsciously detaches itself from the realities of a woman’s lot as a mother, with its related challenges, expectations, desires, concerns and frustrations.”
Dr Emma Cunliffe, who wrote the book “Murder, Medicine and Motherhood” about Kathy’s conviction, agreed. She tweeted: “Kathleen Folbigg testified today at the Inquiry into her convictions. This Inquiry’s procedure has been unusual to the point of raising concerns – both about procedural fairness and about how well the truth seeking purpose of the Inquiry is being served.”
After watching the inquiry via video link at Silverwater Jail for the first two weeks, Kathy appeared in the witness box at 10am this morning and was subjected to hours of intense questioning.
She broke down in tears – as did many of her supporters – when she described the moments she found her children dead.
“When I found the children I was always alone,” she told the court. “He (Craig) wasn’t the one who found them I was.”
When asked about a diary entry in which she wrote that she was worried about being alone with her child, Kathy said it referred to being “scared to death of not finding my child alive”.
She added: “I do feel responsible, I was their mother. I’ve always felt I didn’t do enough. Something went wrong and I was always searching for why.
“I was constantly doubting my ability as a mother.”
Kathy’s ex-husband sat in the public gallery during Kathy’s questioning, with his brothers, his solicitor and a barrister by his side. The Folbigg brothers smiled as she wept in court.
Eid previously told the media that Craig wanted to be certain all “reasonable and appropriate evidence” was examined and “in light of the fresh inquiry he wants to be sure nothing is missed that could be relevant”.
Justice for Kathleen Folbigg remains baffled as to why making sure “nothing is missed that could be relevant” does not extend to Craig’s DNA.
While on the stand today, Kathy repeatedly denied killing her children.
“I miss all my children all the time,” she said.
During questioning by the Director of Public Prosecutions barrister Christopher Maxwell QC, Kathy denied disposing of some of her diaries because entries about her dead children were “incriminating”.
“I have never hid my diaries,” she told the court. “They were always in places where people could see them.”
After being noticeably absent since day one of the inquiry, the court was inundated with media today for Kathy’s appearance.
When Kathy gave her supporters in the public gallery a brief smile at one point, it was disappointingly captioned by The Daily Mail as: “Serial killer Kathleen Folbigg has smirked in court ahead of giving evidence during an inquiry into her convictions for killing her four children.”
It’s a disturbing example of how the smallest, most innocent of gestures can be twisted. Kathy’s supporters are devastated that her acknowledgement of them has been portrayed this way.
Justice for Kathleen Folbigg is appalled – but not surprised – that a well-meaning smile from a woman who lost her beloved children more than 20 years ago has been used against her in the press.
Kathleen Folbigg’s supporters have gathered in Sydney for the third week of the judicial inquiry into her convictions.
They will join her in the court as she enters the witness box at the Forensic Medicine and Coroner’s Court complex in Lidcombe on Monday.
We know that seeing their loving faces in the room will mean so much to Kathy on such a stressful day.
A group of former school friends visited Kathy at Silverwater Jail on Sunday to give her a hug prior to the momentous week ahead.
They say that she is nervous but glad to be finally speaking in a court of law about her diary entries.
Tracy Chapman said: “It means a lot to know there are a growing number of you seeking justice on her behalf. She asked us to say thank you for everything you’ve all done thus far and she hopes to get the opportunity to thank you all in person someday soon.”
Quentin McDermott at ABC News reports: “At 10 o’clock, Kathleen Folbigg will step into the witness box in a bid to clear her name, and — for the first time in a court of law — give her version of what she meant when she wrote in her diaries about her four infant children who died.”
Kathy previously explained the meaning behind some of the passages to Tracy in a series of telephone conversations from Cessnock jail, broadcast on Australian Story.
“Those diaries are written from a point of me always blaming myself,” she said. “I blamed myself for everything. I took so much of the responsibility, because that’s, as mothers, what you do.”
Read Quentin’s full article by clicking here.
Tracy notes: “Buckle up for the final week of the inquiry all, it’s an incredibly important week, and I guarantee it will be one hell of a wild ride.”
Finally, these kind words from another supporter express how many of us are feeling: “Loving prayerful thoughts for everyone tomorrow, especially for Kath. We pray that she will be calm in her spirit, have clarity of mind, be unfazed by the legal arguments, and feel tenderly wrapped with the quiet strength her heart will need.”
Friends of Kathy visited her at Silverwater Correctional Complex today prior to the second week of the inquiry into her convictions.
They hugged her tightly, knowing how difficult she found the first week of the inquiry.
Kathy watched the proceeding alone via video link each day. She admitted it was incredibly tough to listen to details of the autopsies that were performed on her children. Some of the information provided in court had not been heard before, such as the fact her daughter Laura was subjected to a second, incredibly invasive autopsy.
This week has been set aside to hear evidence relevant to genetics, cardiology and neurology.
The week beginning Monday, April 29, 2019 has been set aside for Kathy to give evidence about her diary entries. The evidence from Kathy will be restricted and the cross-examination of her will be restricted to those particular issues.
Naturally, Kathy feels anxious about appearing in court, but she is determined to speak for herself and her beloved children.
The substantive hearings will be held at the Forensic Medicine and Coroner’s Court complex located on 1A Main Avenue, Lidcombe.
She thanks everyone who has given their support, it has helped ease her pain during this difficult time.
Pictured: Counsel assisting the Folbigg inquiry, Gail Furness, SC, delivering the inquiry’s opening address at Lidcombe Coroner’s Court.
Solicitor Danny Eid was granted leave to represent Craig Folbigg at Kathy’s inquiry during a brief directions hearing in Sydney today.
Outside the court Eid said Craig wanted to be certain all “reasonable and appropriate evidence” was examined and “in light of the fresh inquiry he wants to be sure nothing is missed that could be relevant”.
However, making “sure nothing is missed” doesn’t extend to providing DNA to the inquiry.
The inquiry has previously heard that Craig complained to the Law Society of NSW after being approached by a solicitor for his former wife over DNA and “absolutely refusing to provide a sample”.
Justice for Kathleen Folbigg wonder how such a refusal ensures everything “relevant” is examined?
Eid said Kathy’s diary entries were a source of interest for Craig’s legal team.
Former District Court chief judge Reginald Blanch, who is heading the inquiry, was told Kathy’s lawyers were still preparing a number of reports to be presented to the inquiry, including a psychiatrist’s report.
Counsel assisting the inquiry, Gail Furness, SC, told the inquiry Blanch had already indicated a psychiatrist’s report would be of little assistance.
“At the moment I can’t begin to understand what possible assistance it could be to the inquiry,” Blanch said.
A lawyer for Kathy said the report would be submitted to Furness “and a determination made if it’s of assistance or not”.
Substantive hearing dates for the hearing of expert medical evidence by the inquiry were held the week beginning Monday, March 18, 2019. They focussed on evidence relevant to forensic pathology and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) or Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy (SUDI).
The week beginning Monday, April 15, 2019 has been set aside to hear evidence relevant to genetics, cardiology and neurology.
The week beginning Monday, April 29, 2019 has been set aside for Kathy to give evidence about the diary entries, possession of the diaries and her disposal of the diaries. The evidence from Kathy will be restricted and the cross-examination of her will be restricted to those particular issues.
Proceedings were much quieter on the second day of the Kathleen Folbigg inquiry, without a camera in sight at Lidcombe coroner’s court.
Kathy’s friends Megan and Tracy say the second day in court went well, with four forensic pathologists giving evidence into whether there has been a miscarriage of justice in her convictions.
Megan was impressed with the expert opinions given regarding SIDS and the probable causes of death for Kathy’s four children.
For example, consulting forensic pathologist Johan Duflou noted that he believed Laura died from myocarditis and Patrick from a fit.
The petition that led to the inquiry included a report by Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine director Professor Stephen Cordner, who said the trial included evidence given under circumstances where a “default diagnosis of murder” was discussed.
“The default diagnosis of murder came into play as an incorrect inference arising from the following question which was asked of some of the doctors: ‘Have you ever heard of a family with three or four sudden unexplained infant or childhood deaths?
“The uniform answer was no, with the inference being that murder was therefore the only alternative. This default position was wrong.
“The fact that an infant can be smothered without leaving signs, the misunderstanding of asphyxia (in particular that it is a diagnosis and/or that it can be diagnosed), and there being no families in the literature with three or four SIDS, contributed significantly to a homicide hypothesis which in fact has little forensic pathology content.”
Questioned by counsel assisting the inquiry, Gail Furness, SC, about whether SIDS always meant a natural death, Professor Cordner stated at the inquiry that it did not.
“We all understand whenever we use the word or term SIDS, there’s always the possibility there may be an unnatural explanation, or there may be a natural explanation we can’t uncover,” he noted.
“So to the extent there was a thought that SIDS was a natural cause of death, I’m not sure I’d completely agree with that.
“It is a term some people may hear as natural death, but I don’t believe that forensic pathologists generally believe they are absolutely saying it is a natural death.”
The second day of the inquiry mainly focussed on Kathy’s first child Caleb’s death, with discussion of the other autopsies to continue on day three.
Pictured: Kathy’s lawyer Jeremy Morris SC.
Kathy’s longtime friends Tracy and Megan (above) have spent the day in Lidcombe coroner’s court watching the hearing into her convictions commence.
Tracy ducked out at one point to give a radio interview to the ABC. Click here to listen to it.
It’s been a huge few weeks for Kathy’s supporters. Tracy also appeared in a 60 Minutes story on Sunday night, which saw reporter Tara Brown question an expert called Dr Ophoven, who admitted she had incorrectly relied on the controversial – and now discredited – Cot Death Theory, made famous by British Professor Roy Meadow, which stated that one cot death is a tragedy, two is suspicious, three murder.
Dr Ophoven used the theory during an eerily similar trial to Kathy’s, that of fellow Australian Carol Matthey, who was accused of killing her four children, Jacob, seven months, Chloe, nine weeks, Joshua, three months, and Shania, three and a half years old, between 1998 and 2003. She insisted that the chance of four unexplained infant deaths from natural causes was one in a trillion.
It’s the theory that sent several UK mothers to jail in the lead up to Kathy’s trial. But a fundamental statistical error in Meadow’s Law eventually saw the theory discredited and multiple murder convictions overturned.
In the UK alone, four grieving mothers – falsely accused and wrongly convicted – walked free.
When Brown questioned Dr Ophoven on the validity of the theory she used against Folbigg, she confirmed she “was incorrect” concerning the statistical rarity of so many children from one family dying of natural causes.
“That was incorrect. I was just citing previous literature – Roy Meadow,” Dr Ophoven said. “I would never say that now, but I wouldn’t change my diagnosis now. I would just say that it would be impossibly rare.”
Clinical psychologist Dr Sharmila Betts, who examined Kathy’s diary entries, also told 60 Minutes in her opinion not even Kathleen’s darkest writings were enough to convict her.
“The diaries reveal a tortured mind, and I’d be very surprised if there are not millions of mothers who think like that,” Betts told Brown.
Meanwhile, ABC journalist Quentin McDermott has published a news story discussing new evidence in the case that argues that there are plausible natural causes of death for Kathy’s children.
It reveals that Kathy’s third child, Sarah Folbigg, may have died earlier in the night than previously thought, in August 1993.
Consulting forensic pathologist Johan Duflou said in his view, taking into account the temperature of the child’s body and the stomach contents, “this would suggest that Sarah died closer to the time she was put to bed by [Kathy’s husband] Craig at around 21:00 hours, rather than when found by Folbigg at around 01:30 hours.”
Professor Duflou’s view challenges the argument presented by the prosecution at Kathy’s trial, that she was present with all four of her children when they died.
McDermott also noted that Allan Cala, who was the chief medical expert at Kathy’s trial, is expected to give evidence on Tuesday, March 19, as will Stephen Cordner, who did not give evidence at the trial, but who wrote a lengthy report which was attached to the petition, and John Hilton, who conducted the autopsy of Kathy’s third child Sarah, and gave evidence at the trial.
“The ABC understands that Dr Cala stands by the opinion he expressed at Kathy’s trial, that she smothered all four of her children,” McDermott writes. “But, both Professor Cordner and Professor Hilton disagree.”
In his report accompanying the petition, Professor Cordner wrote that: “If the convictions in this case are to stand, I want to clearly state there is no pathological or medical basis for concluding homicide.
“The findings are perfectly compatible with natural causes.”
He added: “Put simply, there is no positive forensic pathology support for the contention that any or all of these children have been killed.”
In his own statement submitted to the inquiry, Professor Hilton said he was “in substantial agreement with the comments, views and opinions” expressed by Professor Cordner in his report.
Significantly, Professor Hilton backs Professor Cordner’s view that Kathy’s fourth and oldest child, Laura, died from natural causes — in this case the illness known as myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscles.
“Laura died with, and highly probably because of, florid myocarditis,” Professor Hilton wrote.
“There was no medical evidence demonstrable or demonstrated in the report of the post-mortem examination to support another cause for her death.”
Professor Duflou backed the views of Professor Hilton and Professor Cordner in his statement to the inquiry: “In my opinion, there is without doubt myocarditis of a severity which can readily cause sudden and unexpected death … in this case, no competing cause of death has been identified at autopsy; therefore based purely on the autopsy findings, the cause of death would be given as myocarditis.”
Click here to read McDermott’s story, which resulted in the barrister acting for Kathy to be blasted by the judicial officer presiding over the inquiry into her convictions – former NSW District Court chief judge Reginald Blanch QC (above) – over the documents being leaked.
According to Tracy and Megz Tuesday will be a “bombshell day” in the case.
Kathy has also confirmed in writing that she will testify on April 17 and 18.
It’s the moment that felt like it would never come for Kathleen Folbigg’s supporters: the inquiry into her convictions begins on Monday.
Next week has been set aside to hear evidence relevant to forensic pathology and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) or Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy (SUDI). April 15-16 have been set aside to hear evidence relevant to genetics and cardiology. April 17-18 have been set aside for Kathy to give evidence, if she chooses to do so.
The substantive hearings will be held at the Forensic Medicine and Coroner’s Court complex located on 1A Main Avenue, Lidcombe.
This Sunday night, 60 Minutes is running an interview with an Australian mother who suffered an identical tragedy to Kathy – four of her children dying of SIDS – but who walked free from court.
The program notes: “Kathleen Folbigg and Carol Matthey are mothers bound by terrible tragedy: both had four babies die. But while Kathleen was found guilty of murder and jailed, Carol was never convicted.”
It’s the first time in 12 years that Carol Matthey has spoken to the media since her preliminary hearing in 2007.
Kathy’s long-time friend Tracy Chapman tells Justice for Kathleen Folbigg: “I had the privilege of meeting Carol, spending time with her and hearing her story. The correlations between the two cases are astounding … The outcomes in both cases are polar opposites. The suffering of these two women, undeniable.”
Watch the preview of the segment below:
We have no idea how the finished program will pan out. Will it paint Kathy as Australia’s worst serial killer or suggest reasonable doubt?
Tune in on Sunday night and let us know your thoughts.
A group of Kathy’s supporters will attend the inquiry. We’ll try to keep you in the loop as much as we can about the proceeding.
“Next week I’ll sit watching Lidcome Coroner’s Court, heart in mouth, knowing that many years of hard work and dedication are about to decide Kath’s future,” Tracy said.
She also thanked the author Emma Cunliffe, Kathy’s legal team and friends who have worked tirelessly to make this milestone moment happen.
Intense days ahead, especially for Kathy, who has spent the last 16 years in a jail cell and is desperately hoping expert witnesses will convince the inquiry that she didn’t murder her four children.
Kathy’s supporters remain disappointed that Kathy’s former husband and the father of her children, Craig Folbigg, has refused to provide a DNA sample for analysis.
A fourth directions hearing prior to the judicial review of Kathy’s case was held at the Chief Secretary’s Building in Bridge Street, Sydney today.
Kathy – via her legal team – has asked for permission to watch the hearings on video link from Silverwater Jail. She has yet to decide if she will give evidence at the review.
Hearings will begin on March 18 at Lidcombe Coroners Court. Forensic pathologists and sudden infant death syndrome experts will be the first to testify, followed by a panel of geneticists in mid-April.
Former NSW District Court chief judge Reginald Blanch, who’s heading the inquiry, said April 17 and 18 have been set aside for Kathy to give evidence if she chooses to do so. But she will be required to give one-month’s notice if she intends to appear at the Coroners Court.
“The scope of the inquiry will not include the evidence of Folbigg unless we are notified in writing by March 17 that she does intend to give evidence,” Blanch noted.
The inquiry will focus on medical advances and new research, including findings on multiple natural infant deaths in the one family.
Kathy’s friend Tracy Chapman has shared her frustration that today’s media reports continue to rely on sensationalist language, referring to her as a “serial baby killer”.
“I’m tired of reading this,” she said. “I hope that one day they’ll think about how such headlines stick, hurt, frustrate and affect real people, before they do it again to some other poor person.”